COSMO-02 COSMOLOGY EDUCATION FORUM

The COSMO-02 conference was held September 18-21, 2002 in Chicago, IL. The evening of Wednesday September 18 featured a two hour education forum dedicated to the question:

"What do we want people to know about cosmology and why?"

Now available: A summary of the discussion, notes from the speakers, links, resources and more!



Forum Description

Schedule:

  • First Hour: Three invited talks.

  • The invited speakers gave examples of reasons why we want the average educated person to know information from cosmology and some of the big ideas they find important for people to know, as well as some of the issues involved in formal and informal cosmology education.

  • Second Hour: Discussion forum moderated by Kim Coble.

  • In the discussion part of the forum, the audience gave input into a list of what, why and how we want people to know about cosmology. This gave scientists, educators, journalists and the public a chance to engage in a dialog on cosmology. The list is given below, as a starting point of topics to be included in astronomy/cosmology classes for non-science majors, informal public education (lectures, museums, writing, etc.), and for the average person interested in cosmology to have a starting point for learning what the key ideas are from cosmology.


    Audience:

    The audience was about 60 people, including cosmologists, educators, journalists and members of the public.


    Objectives:

  • Provide a starting point of topics to be included in classes for non-science majors and for informal public education (lectures, museum, science writing, etc.)
  • Provide a starting point for the average person for learning what the key ideas are from cosmology.


  • Invited Speakers, Abstracts, Notes and Other Resources

    Todd Duncan, Science Integration Institute and Portland State University

    Adrian Melott, University of Kansas; founding Board member, Kansas Citizens for Science

    Roger Freedman, U. C. Santa Barbara; co-author of the "Universe" textbook

    Forum Discussion Summary

    The lively discussion was a dialog among scientists, educators, journalists and the public. We organized the discussion into a list of what, why and how people should learn about cosmology. A litmus test for each item in the "what" category was: "What good will it do someone to know this?" A litmus test for the "how" category was: "Will the information sink in if we use this method?" "Why" we want people to learn something from cosmology motivates much of the "what" and "how." One final question to consider: "What would success in cosmology education look like?"

    First we brainstormed:

    What
    Why
    How
    • Old (though not inifinitely so)
    • Big
    • Evolving
    • Expanding
    • Empty (vast spaces)
    • Origins: where we come from in the cosmic sense
    • What things are made of: the Universe and us
    • Tie in with the development of life
    • Cover what four year olds find interesting rather than research questions
    • There's still deep stuff to learn about the Universe
    • Process of science: its empirical nature
    • The cosmos is the backdrop against which we live and act; science provides a good way of discovering its nature
    • Connections between the individual and the Universe
    • People have an innate interest in cosmology
    • People look for origins "story;" we should tell them what science has to say
    • Promote love of learning
    • Give a perspective of our smallness so that we might not fight over petty things
    • Great examples to learn process of science
    • Knowing the scientific process in one discipline helps people understand others
    • Rationality is important for maintaining our high standard of living
    • Point out connections with audience experience
    • Address audience background, even if difficult
    • Make cosmology accessible
    • Don't be intimidating
    • Don't be an authority figure
    • Use labs and hands-on exercises to engage students in process of science
    • Use techniques found to work from astronomy and physics education research
    • Use assessment techniques to see if goals were reached
    • Take field trips to dark skies, planetaria
    • Use technology (VR, etc.) to help students visualize difficult concepts
    • K-12 implementation issues: provide needed expertise resources to teachers
    • Develop good relationships with journalists

    Most of these ideas fell into a few main categories that we kept coming back to:

    What
    Why
    How
    • The Universe is vast in space and time
    • The Universe is evolving
    • The empirical process of science
    • The cosmos is the stage on which we live and act
    • Science provides a good way of discovering the nature of our cosmos
    • Help develop and maintain innate sense of awe; cosmology touches core questions
    • Address audience and make connections
    • Make cosmology accessibile
    • Use techniques to engage students in the process of science

    Additional Links:
    Astronomy Education Review (astronomy education research)
    Kim Coble's cosmology links and references

    Comments or additions to this list? Contact the organizer below.


    Forum Site and Time

    The forum was at the conference hotel, the Chicago Hyatt Regency, from 7 - 9 pm on Wednesday September 18, 2002. The Chicago Hyatt Regency is located at 151 East Wacker Drive.


    Registration

    There is no registration fee and walk-ins are welcome and encouraged. If you know in advance that you will be able to attend the forum, send email to the forum organizer, Dr. Kim Coble in order to guarantee yourself a seat.


    Contact the Forum Organizer

    The organizer of the education forum is:
    Dr. Kim Coble
    University of Chicago Astronomy and Astrophysics
    Adler Planetarium
    coble@hyde.uchicago.edu
    773-834-2103


    Sponsor

    The Cosmo-02 Cosmology Education Forum is sponsored by the Center for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago.


    last modified 9/26/02

    Disclaimer: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under the AAPF program. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF).